In recent years, the lighting industry has been in search of standard measurements that designers can use to ensure the proper levels of melanopic lighting in different circumstances. As with many emerging standards, competing metrics have been proposed.
The two most widely adopted have been melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (m-EDI) and equivalent melanopic lux (EML). Both metrics are intended to quantify the amount of light most responsible for affecting the human circadian rhythm—that is to say, the amount of light in and around the blue portion of the visible light spectrum (technically speaking, in the region of 480 nm).
The International Commission on Illumination (CIE) supports m-EDI, as does Signify. Without getting into the mathematics, suffice it to say that m-EDI does a better job of quantifying the spectrum of light in combination with its brightness (intensity).
Experts like the CIE, and standards like the WELL Building Standard, can now make recommendations for levels of melanopic lux in offices and other lit environments. The recommendations funded by the 2nd International Workshop on Circadian and Neurophysiological Photometry mentioned above call for 250 melanopic lux or greater during the daytime, and less than 10 melanopic lux in the hours leading up to bedtime. Similarly, the CIE recommends “high melanopic EDI during the day [to support] alertness, the circadian rhythm and a good night’s sleep,” and “low melanopic EDI in the evening and at night [to facilitate] sleep initiation and consolidation.”
Continue reading part 3 of our 4-part series on lighting for health and well-being.